Forgive the absence. I tried to begin a new media platform but my tech skills are far too poor to make it work, so I've decided to publish ten important bits of information every day to keep a record of what is happening.
Use this website as a resource. If you come across anything I miss, please forward it to me so I can include it in future releases.
We've moved towards the next step of the pre-mediated Great Reset agenda. The vaccine passports are a declaration of war. This is not an exaggeration. Vaccine passports protect or help no one. If you're vaccinated and it supposedly works - it does not matter if the person next to you is or isn't. It serves only to implement a controlling bio-security state and reverses the relationship between free people and the government.
This leads on nicely to the first important document today:
1. Evidence that the EU was planning for the need of vaccine passports the year before covid-19 began:
“ROADMAP FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ACTIONS BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION BASED ON THE COMMISSION COMMUNICATION AND THE COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION ON STRENGTHENING COOPERATION AGAINST VACCINE PREVENTABLE DISEASES”
Besides the fact that this began in 2018, note that the language very clearly states “stakeholder” which is Klaus Schwab’s entire thesis behind his Great Reset.
“Create a sustainable and multi-stakeholder platform for EU post-marketing surveillance studies monitoring the safety, effectiveness, and impact of vaccination”
2. The UN along with other global organisations are using the vaccine rhetoric to spread false division of social inequalities. The only real division is humanity vs globalist stakeholders.
"Highlighting the inequalities and injustices that have been apparent throughout the pandemic, Secretary-General António Guterres said in his message for the day to be marked on Wednesday, that the vast majority of vaccine doses administered so far, have been confined to “a few wealthy countries” or those producing the shots cleared for distribution."
This is classic propaganda designed to generate an emotional response that the third world need these vaccines and the West are once again the villains. No one needs these vaccines. This is an attempt to drive up uptake of this rushed medical procedure.
3. The covid-19 rhetoric is being used interchangeably with climate change. Sky News decided that during a supposed deadly pandemic, they need to create a brand new Daily Climate Show:
"In this critical year for action ahead of COP26, The Daily Climate Show from Sky News will feature forensic data-journalism, expert analysis and eye-witness reporting and look at the solutions to climate change.
COP26 president Alok Sharma said: "I'm delighted to see how Sky, a Principal Partner and Media Partner for COP26, is informing and engaging its viewers about the climate crisis, and the need for urgent action, through the Daily Climate Show.
"Businesses, including media organisations, have a key part to play on the road to Glasgow and in helping us all build back greener."
It's incredible that Build Back Better was first coined during the initial outbreak of this "pandemic" by Klaus Schwab and the WEF. This was before we even knew it was going to be a bit longer than locking down for three weeks. BUT, somehow, Klaus just knew we'd have to build back better!
4. Similarly, six months ago, the WEF along with others sponsored the climate clock erection in NY. Again, a weird time to focus on this given we were supposedly in the midst of a deadly pandemic. However, it is quite a coincidence that the goals for living with "pandemics" and "climate change" seem to be exactly the same. Thankfully, the World Economic Forum have planned everything out for the entire world of which we clearly are just meant to go along with:
"Four changes will define the way we work 5 years from now.
Work from home (or "remotopia"), green jobs, the gig-revolution and automation will rewrite the rulebooks.
Organizations have an opportunity now to shape the future they want rather than simply manage the future that comes."
5. The "vaccine science" is constantly contradictory.
"They work, but they don't, but we don't know" seems to be an accurate summary.
"The vaccines are the way out, but they're not, and you will still need masks, social distancing and lockdowns, may be."
This medical journal looks at health care workers in the US becoming re-infected after vaccination:
"The rarity of positive test results 14 days after administration of the second dose of vaccine is encouraging and suggests that the efficacy of these vaccines is maintained outside the trial setting. These data underscore the critical importance of continued public health mitigation measures (masking, physical distancing, daily symptom screening, and regular testing), even in environments with a high incidence of vaccination, until herd immunity is reached at large."
Perhaps Dr Sam Bailey can help you understand some of the actual science.
6. Countries like Sweden and States like Florida and South Dakota with no lockdowns see lower death rates than idiotic countries like ours:
"Preliminary data from EU statistics agency Eurostat compiled by Reuters showed Sweden had 7.7% more deaths in 2020 than its average for the preceding four years. Countries that opted for several periods of strict lockdowns, such as Spain and Belgium, had so-called excess mortality of 18.1% and 16.2% respectively."
The media also use the 5 year average when measuring death rates as if it is an accurate measurement for a "pandemic." Why not try 10, 20 or 50 year averages? It would paint a much more realistic picture. Check out my earlier blog with some beautiful graphs.
7. The National Institute of Health begin to realise they may be in for a spot of trouble and admit these are not traditional vaccines and shouldn't be treated as such. They also begin to admit patient consent requires honesty from the medical party, which is being withheld:
"COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials."
8. Geert Vanden Bossche and Dr Philip McMillan discuss the risks of vaccinating people during a pandemic. We're told to "follow the science" as if it is a doctrine. Unfortunately, there are many opinions and scientific analyses one must consider to make wise decisions. We're told to listen to one analysis (the corrupt Pharmaceutical Corporations and corrupt WHO's primarily.) I choose to listen to a range of experts. I disagree with Geert on the seriousness of this "pandemic" and believe Dr Sam Bailey and Claus Köhnlein's views are more accurate but that's not important.
What is important is you listening to other experts (that do not seem to be invited on the mainstream media unless they're on certain payrolls) and making up your own mind like an adult.
This is who Geert Vanden Bossche is:
"Geert Vanden Bossche (DVM, PhD)
Geert Vanden Bossche received his DVM from the University of Ghent, Belgium, and his PhD degree in Virology from the University of Hohenheim, Germany. He held adjunct faculty appointments at universities in Belgium and Germany. After his career in Academia, Geert joined several vaccine companies (GSK Biologicals, Novartis Vaccines, Solvay Biologicals) to serve various roles in vaccine R&D as well as in late vaccine development. Geert then moved on to join the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Global Health Discovery team in Seattle (USA) as Senior Program Officer; he then worked with the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) in Geneva as Senior Ebola Program Manager. At GAVI he tracked efforts to develop an Ebola vaccine. He also represented GAVI in fora with other partners, including WHO, to review progress on the fight against Ebola and to build plans for global pandemic preparedness. Back in 2015, Geert scrutinized and questioned the safety of the Ebola vaccine that was used in ring vaccination trials conducted by WHO in Guinea. His critical scientific analysis and report on the data published by WHO in the Lancet in 2015 was sent to all international health and regulatory authorities involved in the Ebola vaccination program. After working for GAVI, Geert joined the German Center for Infection Research in Cologne as Head of the Vaccine Development Office. He is at present primarily serving as a Biotech/ Vaccine consultant while also conducting his own research on Natural Killer cell-based vaccines."
9. Central Bank Digital Currencies are already rolling out. Unfortunately, yet another conspiracy theory set to become a reality. Now, I wonder if you can imagine what links there could be between vaccination passports and CBDC's? This is a Bank for International Settlements update on the CBDCs:
"Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are an opportunity for central banks to offer a technologically advanced representation of central bank money for the digital economy. Their introduction will have profound effects for users, central banks, financial institutions and the international monetary system. A retail CBDC could address long-standing and emerging issues in payments. It could increase competition, lower fees and encourage innovation. CBDCs would be part of an ecosystem with a range of private sector payment providers, and be designed to enhance efficiency without impairing central banks' monetary policy and financial stability mandates and within today's two-tier financial system. Multi-CBDC arrangements could tackle frictions in today's correspondent banking systems, such as differences in the opening hours of payment systems, varying communication standards and a lack of transparency around exchange rates or fees. Central banks around the world are collaborating to put this big idea into practice."
10. CBDC cross-border payments are going to be the big issue. Instead of free people having the freedom to choose private currencies they trust and want, it sounds like it would just be easier to just create a controlled, centralised system of "safe" central bank digital currencies:
"The Bank for International Settlements is conducting experiments on mCBDC arrangements with its Innovation Hub, exploring some of the outlined models together with central banks. One example is the mCBDC Bridge initiative, which explores a single multi-currency CBDC system (model 3 outlined above). As central banks progress with their CBDC research and development, there are a significant number of policy considerations. A review of the conceptual options and recent history of interoperability highlights some steps for central banks to encourage efficient cross-border payments if CBDCs are issued. Coordinating early and openly can help central banks in identifying unintended barriers. This will aid efficiency. Yet for those central banks aiming to avoid competition from global stablecoins, it is a question of safety. A positive way to prevent widespread use of private global currencies is by fostering an efficient and convenient way to convert currencies. A CBDC, compatible with others and benefiting from a diverse and competitive market for services, would be a real public good. To achieve this, central banks will need to collaborate."
Fantastic. Can you think of any risks or negatives consequences of such a monetary framework?
Any reports, interviews, stories or science articles you find particularly important please save, print or download and send to your loved ones. All of these are mainstream sources or qualified experts. Remember, people do not have to agree with you. But, they do need to know that important and often contradictory information is being withheld from them.
1. EU vaccine road map - https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/vaccination/docs/2019-2022_roadmap_en.pdf
2. UN inequality propaganda - https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/04/1089042
3. Daily Climate Show on Sky News - Great Reset propaganda - https://news.sky.com/story/the-daily-climate-show-sky-news-launches-prime-time-programme-dedicated-to-global-crisis-12252536
4. WEF planning the future of work for 2025 - no return to normal - https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/11/4-ways-work-will-be-different-in-2025/
5. Health care workers infected after vaccination - https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2101927
6. Sweden low death rates in 2020 - https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-europe-mortality-idUSKBN2BG1R9
7. NIH commenting on informed consent - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/
8. Geert Vanden Bossche outlining risks of vaccinations during pandemic - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eqoCLHH1e8&list=LL&index=41&t=486s
9. Bank for International Settlements update on CBDCs - https://www.bis.org/speeches/sp210331.htm
10. BIS seem to hint to centralised global currencies - https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap115.pdf