Look what came across the screen:
This was from the Sydney Morning Herald, in 2003!
Yes people, before 2020, masks did not provide protection. In fact, they did more damage as you kept breathing in what you were meant to be breathing out, thus potentially, making you ill.
But, 2020-2021? Who cares about actual science? We have doctrine now!
How ironic, seventeen years ago companies would have been fined for lying about the effectiveness of masks. Now, YOU'RE fined for not wearing one.
We all remember in the peak of the "pandemic" last year when Chris Whitty and Anthony Fauci both said masks were ineffective? Then, when the "pandemic" was at it's lowest, they changed their mind and mandated masks. Did you not wonder why this was the case?
Let's get back to the article and read some quotes:
Health authorities have warned that surgical masks may not be an effective protection against the virus.
"Those masks are only effective so long as they are dry," said Professor Yvonne Cossart of the Department of Infectious Diseases at the University of Sydney.
"As soon as they become saturated with the moisture in your breath they stop doing their job and pass on the droplets."
Rosemary Taylor, of Kirribilli, arrived in Sydney from Shanghai last week after a two-week holiday in China. Ms Taylor and travelling companion Joan Switzer had worn the masks during the trip home, even though they had been warned they were of little value.
"We were told you need 16 layers on your mask for it to offer 95 per cent protection," Ms Taylor said.
In one of my previous blogs, when I went through some actual face mask studies, one of them said - "to be effective, they need to be able to block light." It sounds quite similar to the "16 layers."
Come on. Stop playing the game. You are being groomed and primed into unquestioning obedience. Face masks are about political obedience, not your safety.