"Norwegian authorities have prioritised the immunisation of residents in nursing homes, most of whom are very elderly with underlying medical conditions and some of whom are terminally ill. NOMA confirm the number of incidents so far is not alarming, and in line with expectations. All reported deaths will be thoroughly evaluated by NOMA to determine if these incidents are related to the vaccine. The Norwegian government will also consider adjusting their vaccination instructions to take the patients’ health into more consideration."
Well, when we looked over the Pfizer protocols for the vaccine trials in previous blogs, we observed a lack volunteers who were in the elderly age brackets , and none with comorbidities were included:
"The main study limitations were its single-blind design, the inclusion of few participants older than 80 years, and exclusion of people with substantial underlying chronic illnesses and frailty."
One could presume, this is why long term testing is quite desirable. May be if we're going to vaccinate the entire world, it's worth throwing in a couple of people with comorbidities as 99% of people will have a couple. Remember, we're locked down, creating poverty, dependence and authoritarian rule on the premise, we're looking after the vulnerable and elderly. Yet, the vaccine trials do not even focus on this group. Fantastic.
I find it fascinating how the amount of people dying immediately from the vaccine is "in line with expectations" but anyone who dies within 28 of a virus in 2020/2021 is not i.e. people who literally died of anything whilst testing positive for covid-19.
I wonder if the elderly who died after this vaccine were happy that they were forced to stay away from all their loved ones for an entire year? They obviously died without touching a loved one for over a year if they were following the rules. It doesn't really seem worth it to me, but if the governments and Pfizer says it's "within expectations" who are we to question it? I don't presume to know, but I'd guess they'd have preferred to be given the choice to hug their loved ones and risk getting the virus which is completely treatable with antivirals. Despite the politicisation of hydroxychloroquine, even that is proven to be effective at low doses for people with moderate symptoms. The fraudulent studies published to try and disprove the effectiveness of this drug demonstrates how corrupt the medical-complex is. They risk further harm for the sake of vaccine promotion to line their pockets. Thankfully, as the BMJ study states, many other experts rally and push back against the narrative, it's just a shame our dinosaur-corrupt-scum-mainstream media do not report it.
So, in summary - any death within 28 days of a positive PCR test means the end of the world, but any death immediately after a rushed, new-era vaccine is "within expectations."
Pfizer and Norwegian Government response - https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n149
Effective antivirals used - https://www.health.harvard.edu/diseases-and-conditions/treatments-for-covid-19
Comment on trial protocols - https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32481-8/fulltext?rss=yes
BMJ comment on hyroxychloroquine - https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m2378